Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> is better solved by improved education

From the article, this has nothing to do with education. It's:

> The app is mainly designed to help users block and track lost or stolen smartphones across all telecom networks, using a central registry. It also lets them identify, and disconnect, fraudulent mobile connections.

If your phone gets stolen, you can disable it.

I'm not saying that a government app is necessarily the right or best way to go about this, but to suggest that this can be solved with education misses the point entirely. No amount of education is going to prevent someone on a bike swiping my phone from my hand and cycling off with it.

And as long as the app isn't otherwise spying on you (and there's no mention of that), I don't see much of what this has to do with freedom either. The freedom to steal someone's phone and use it without being blocked? There are already a bunch of apps on my phone I can't uninstall, so that's not new.



> And as long as the app isn't otherwise spying on you (and there's no mention of that)

I think the correlation between "spying" and "saying that you're spying" is 0 or negative


Apps operate in sandboxes. We would need actual information to show that the app was being given special secret permissions, and Apple and Google would likely refuse or at least make public what was being asked of them, in order to maintain their own reputations in being honest about what they track and what they don't.

There's no value in assuming everything is conspiratorial. You'll go crazy.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: