I don't argue that sports betting per se creates more harm than benefit.
I argue that agression per se creates more harm than benefit. The thing is in controlling that requires funds (taxes) and what is more importand abolishing of privacy.
What are your arguments for disagreeing to consider legislation as agression?
We disagree, that's all. Sports betting creates more harm than benefit, based on the evidence, and therefore is worthy of aggressive regulation.
Americans increasingly see legal sports betting as a bad thing for society and sports - https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/10/02/americans... - October 2nd, 2025