Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Even though it goes against all my beliefs and values, I still see it primarily as a desperate attempt to gain at least some means of control over encrypted tools — which are, in fact, constantly used for criminal activity. The endlessly recycled “think of the children” argument is laughably pathetic. I don't understand why they don't present the real and much more reasonable justifications — such as terrorism in Europe or the spread of propaganda, which is a genuine issue here. But those reasons likely don’t sell as well with populists.

That said, I wouldn’t be surprised if this turned into a European version of the Patriot Act — where the state takes advantage of the fact that people have become desensitized, and everyone ends up being monitored 24/7. In the end, every citizen would be under surveillance, while criminals would simply download an app that doesn’t comply with this absurd requirement.



Not incompetent criminals will just workaround, there is no way to avoid that besides 1984 style universal surveillance.


Exactly. Only outcome is more surveillance for others with zero effect on the problem itself.


> the spread of propaganda, which is a genuine issue here

Now we are policing speech?


Because I perceive someone spreading lies with a clear malicious intent as a problem I'm policing a speech? Ok.


Lies according to whom? Are you the judge? You fight lies by presenting clear evidence to the contrary, not by censorship.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: