> He has tons of links for the objective statements.
I stopped at this quote
> LLMs still seem as terrible at this as they'd been in the GPT-3.5 age.
This is so plainly, objectively and quantitatively wrong that I need not bother. I get hyperbole, but this isn't it. This shows a doubling-down on biases that the author has, and no amount of proof will change their mind. Not an article / source for me, then.
He has tons of links for the objective statements. You either accept the interpretation or you don't.