emacs is a really bad comparison, given that it has million of functions and is infinitely customizable. It's slow performance has been subject of many jokes back in the 1970's [0] ("EMACS: Eight Megabytes And Constantly Swapping")
You should at least compare it to "nano" editor, or even better, it's predecessor "pico".
You should at least compare it to "nano" editor, or even better, it's predecessor "pico".
[0] https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/etc/JOKES#...