Wikipedia says this type of propeller is widely used on tugs, so I guess the ABB product is either just their own version of this tech (maybe a patent expired) or they have evolved it somehow, maybe to increase efficiency depending on how you interpret the article.
In a Voith Schneider propeller, there is one power input (as in a rotating shaft) plus a second shaft input that gives the desired thrust direction, and a complex gearbox that drives all the blades and the collective. These are in wide use in tugboats and the like, desired for their ability to output thrust in any direction at a moment's notice. However, their disadvantages are that they are less efficient than traditional propellers, and they don't scale up to high revs or high power output all that well, because of the gearing and the mechanical losses involved.
In this design, there is one large electric motor that drives the collective, and an individual electric motor at the base of every blade. The claim is that this gets you the maneuvering advantages of a V-S, while not suffering from the same disadvantages, and because of better control over the blades is not just more efficient than a V-S prop, but more efficient than traditional screws. And in theory it should scale as big as you want it, which would genuinely make it a significant advance that would see fairly rapid adoption.
That's if it actually works in practice, the only prototypes so far are very small and you don't really know if something scales until you actually scale it.
Gotcha, thank you so much for this breakdown! I agree it seems promising. I would be inclined to believe that this innovation is simple enough it should reliably scale, but as they say the proof is in the pudding.
I have a response to what was the original top comment but now got displaced[0].
In short:
1) If you trivialize any technology nothing is new. Advances happen (mostly) by small steps, not leaps and bounds. According to the article it is more efficient. Seems like a win. Even if it isn't huge or crazy different. Is the lack of novelty because of: their tech? Our understanding of the tech? Something else? Who cares? If it is different it is different.
2) So what if it isn't (very) new? According to that wiki article that engine is made by one group. So even if its novelty is simply different enough to bypass a patent or in house knowledge, so what? More competition is good. What's the point here? We love monopolies? Only one company can make one type of thing? Type being at the abstract level, not detailed?
I'm not sure how either of these is helpful. Maybe you're saying something else, but it isn't clear to me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voith_Schneider_Propeller
Here is a video of a tug boat using this technology, sadly only showing the boat moving but no close up of the propeller.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6uNECa_X8Q