Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> If we do not do the same for all websites then people with disabilities will be kicked out of a normal live.

Years ago, I worked for a university. We were implementing Netscape/iPlanet/Sun email for students. The webmail was not accessible. The director of our disability services office was blind, (she was both a full-time staff member and a part-time student) and she complained it was unusable for her. Sun told us “accessibility is coming in a future version”. What did we do? We gave her a shell account with Pine, and told her we’d offer the same to any other student who couldn’t use the webmail due to disability. She was happy with that outcome.

Similarly, suppose someone like Amazon provides a non-accessible privacy-resistant service, and then offers users with proof of disability an alternative service which is more accessible but less privacy-resistant - depending on the details and the jurisdiction, that might comply with disability discrimination laws.



So you think a person needs to be officially labeled as disabled before they're allowed to use screen readers?

Personally, that doesn't bode well for my deteriorating eyesight, which is still very far from disability, but already at a level where audiobooks are easier than real books.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: