Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>This was especially true back in 2008, before patent examiners should have applied guidance from the Supreme Court’s 2014 Alice v. CLS Bank decision.

>AXS Group, claiming that the companies infringed its patent by using reCAPTCHA. Those cases all settled. ...Trevor Coddington

https://www.insigne.law/team/trevor-q-coddington-ph-d/

"Defeated a motion to dismiss on Alice grounds with Court adopting client’s argument. Confident Technologies Inc. v. AXS Group LLC et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-02181-H-MDD (S.D.Cal.) (“The Court agrees with Plaintiff that the invention claimed in the ‘578 patent is not directed to an abstract idea.”)."

Seems Trevor is good at what he does, which must be misleading the court since Google reCAPTCHA doesnt do what 578 patent describes (selecting “one image,”).



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: