> result = asyncio.run(red(x)) Still much harder to think about/read then result... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		WoodenChair on June 12, 2020 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Async Python is not faster > result = asyncio.run(red(x)) Still much harder to think about/read then `result = red(x)` We should be finding ways to get to the latter with concurrency. async/await is at best a patchwork compromise until we can do better.

joshuamorton on June 12, 2020 [–]

I much prefer the performance implications of my code be explicit than implicit.

Async in this case has less ceremony than threads. But still enough to make thing explicit.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact