> The UI isn't beautiful.

I disagree. HN's UI is perfect.

Hard disagree. It's barely acceptable on desktop, but on a mobile device it's awful. All the links and buttons are tiny, and they're all so crowded together I frequently end up doing dumb things like tapping "flag" when I meant to tap "discuss."

With just a little bit of work HN's UI could be so much better.

Seriously I get that they want the 'shit plain look to scare off normal people' schtick but it's also terrible for accessibility.

For being a company that beats the inclusive and equality drum they seem to go out of their way to make it impossible for people who don't have incredible dexterity or eyesight to use this site.

I love the simple layout but make it accessible to everyone.

I was going to disagree with you on the sites accessibility but after taking a closer look it is pretty bad, though for different reasons. Tables everywhere, missing alt tags, doc language missing, no form labels..

As far as aesthetics I actually like the current site. It serves its purpose well IMO. The real accessibility issues should be addressed per WCAG.

I've been using hn.premii.com for years now ... also available as apps across iOS, Android and Windows UWP. Gives me an optimal reading experience on all my devices, but I'm mostly a lurker so YMMV.

try opera mobile browser. it has a nice zoom feature where the text will always word wrap to fit on the screen!

On mobile, try using https://hackerweb.app/

A much nicer mobile interface for consuming HN, but you'll have to go direct to the site to interact with it.

Still just okay imo.

Sure it looks new and mobiley but all I really want (not OP btw) is the same site but with bigger buttons on mobile.

I have it set up on iOS to auto zoom and to raise the font size a couple clicks but the action buttons are still hard to click on and at least once a day I flag or downvote something I have to then undo.

Unless you have perfect eyesight and dexterity it’s a chore.

I might make what i seek actually. At least then I’ve scratched my own itch.

Maybe an extension?

Can that even be done with the current apis?

The proliferation of third-party mobile apps for HN just proves the point. If HN's UI were decent on mobile, these apps would have no reason to exist.

Oh nice, thank you!

I use the Materialistic app on Android. Works great.

Totally agree.

Perfect and beautiful are two different things.

100% agree that HN's UI is great, but I'm not sure anyone would look at it and say, "oh that's gorgeous." Or at least I wouldn't

After all, the purpose of UI is not to be beautiful, but too many people still think it is

Tiny buttons that are hard to click on mobile.

Markdown that drives people to use block quotes when it isn't needed and make reading quotes a nightmare on mobile.

Clicking the back button after replying doesn't show your post.

Low contrast difference between background and thread title.

The list goes on.

Agreed, it's quite good.

Most complaints seem to be focused on mobile. Eh, on mobile I only consume content, so I don't really care if it's hard to post a comment or vote on mobile. Desktop computing is my jam.

And any complaints about its appearance on desktop are easy to tune to user preferences using a userscript. I have a simple userscript that changes the color scheme to a dark theme I quickly concocted. (Part of why I don't even bother to contribute on mobile is because mobile platforms are so constrained that a quick and dirty userscript isn't particularly easy to use.)

They could have fixed the overflowing fixed-width blocks on mobile, to be honest :) But I agree with you in every sense.

It was worse in the past. The last batch of changes improved a lot already.

I thought I am viewing different website from yours.

I am totally not satisfied hackernews website design and UI.

I'm with medium, but I didn't start there until they allowed for you to use your own domain.

If I want to leave I can re-house my content somewhere else and write a script to have the URLs match medium's article identifiers so I don't lose (much) Google-juice.

Not ideal, and not a perfect escape plan, but better than leaving all my eggs in one pretentious basket.

> f I want to leave I can re-house my content somewhere else and write a script to have the URLs match medium's article identifiers so I don't lose

Didn't they block it? I read a post here about it some time back. I doubt medium would make you leave it easy.