I have to agree. Oriel's position is incredibly self-serving. It also asserts things that are not actually true:
"[... W]e also believe that publishers whose content we access have the right to protect the Integrity and Delivery of their web content from any form of manipulation, change or censorship."
Protection from the government manipulating, changing, or censoring - yes (at least in the US and some other jurisdictions). Protection from the user doing the changing? Um, nope. Didn't work that way with newspapers or magazines; doesn't work that way with the web.
"[... W]e also believe that publishers whose content we access have the right to protect the Integrity and Delivery of their web content from any form of manipulation, change or censorship."
Protection from the government manipulating, changing, or censoring - yes (at least in the US and some other jurisdictions). Protection from the user doing the changing? Um, nope. Didn't work that way with newspapers or magazines; doesn't work that way with the web.