OpenAI parents are not allowing chatgpt to curate pedagogy ... we all have a bookshelf thats it (our pedagogy) ,
but copyright strategies means the ai must mutilate / offuscate way best padagogy away ... they train on it and effectively say dont sound that good , too good is copyrighted
Stake in the ground , as smart phones did ; chargpt will make future dumber + once parasitic dependancy goal accomplished
Schools/ universities getting obliterated student performace tanking. Their mission is parasitic dependence induction "helping the masses" .
Like Google they have successfully pulled the football from Charlie brown on any responsibility over the quality of information provided ... all the other llms are just mirrors of chatgpt conception of an ai interaction experience ... they just announced it gov grants openai perpetual subscription $ fee from every federal employees (so they would be collecting as the employer all of the employees internal deliberations as chatgpt logs which court stated could not be deleted) , it really feels like they are trying to digitize the teachers union lock on student thought and automate out white collar wealth that nip at the heels of capital class).
I think Meta has a problem of none of their users wanting any more of their services and they have a very distinct brand taint
Paying 250m to a genius to more deeply entrap user time and attention is going to look diabolical unless there are measurable user life improvement outcome measurements... if metas more slop addiction that 250m is a diabolical contract
