It's definitely still hypocrisy.

No it isn't, have you never played any game or sport? do you fundamentally not understand the concept of competition?

I'm sorry, but you're acting obtuse if you pretend you don't know why they're being called that.

This is total misinformation.

That's cringy.

I wouldn't characterize the story as a hit piece; the misquotes didn't distort his position. What happened is the LLM accurately summarized his position, but they weren't actually his words in the quotes.

> How many "I deleted the prod database" stories have you seen? Humans do this too.

Humans do it accidentally.

It's going to be a sad day when AI starts messing with us deliberately.

> If you actually read the words used in Steam AI survey you'll know Steam has completely caved in for AI-gen code as well.

And if you actually read the article, you'd see it addressed that.

> Yeah, exactly. And LLM help developers save time from writing the same thing that has be done by other developers for a thousand times.

Like a library?

> It disappoints me that technologists are so skeptical of this technology rather than exploring what it is and why it might be different to what exists today. It's fun! thats the takeaway: it's FUN.

It's most likely fun for you because it's novel, and for a lot of skeptics, AI novelty has long worn off.

Things can be novel and useful at the same time.

The new shiny and new car smell will fade out, but some things stay after that. I'm about 90% sure Claws in some flavour will stay even after the hype slows down.

If a mobile phone company can figure out how to make this cost-efficient and be reasonably sure the assistant won't do anything that gets them in the news, their next device versions will have a similar branded system

I work in AI, I have used OpenClaw since it came out.

> Also - study the code of the likes of Carmack. Consider that he produced the likes of the quake engines in only a couple of years. Reflect long and hard on the raw simplicity of a lot of that code.

There's a tendency to ascribe the entirety of id's technology to Carmack. Michael Abrash, as one example, was a major factor.

You have a pattern of bringing up immigration in response to stories or comments that don't mention it.