Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tumetab1's commentslogin

Since you're getting into a senior role, learn the mantra, it depends :D

The usual trade-off of a well paid software development job is lack of job security and always learning - the skill set is always changing in contrast with other jobs.

My suggestion, stop chase trends and start to hear from mature software developers to get better perspective on what's best to invest on.

And why the mantra is always true?

You can find stable job (slow moving company) doing basic software development and just learn something new every 4 years and then change companies.

Or never change company and be the default expert, because everyone else is changing jobs, get job security, work less hours and have time within your job to uplift your skills.

Keep chasing latest high paid jobs/trends by sacrificing off time.

What's the best option for you? Only you know, it's depends on your own goals.


The downside is that https://haveibeenpwned.com/ can only find "exact email" addressed, as in, you must search for myname@gmail.com, myname+service1@gmail.com, etc.


For those paying attention, NGOs supported by the EU are good example.

Here's a news link https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/01/23/use-of-eu-fund...

I don't have time/will to find more consolidating information but some EU-Elites regularly use NGOs to support their own policy goals, against member states governments and their populations. They always excuse themselves by saying they fund everyone... but one side of the issue usually gets more funds than the other.

If I recall correctly in one "EU wants to monitor the internet" regulations, EU directly funded targeted AD campaigns to convinced some Member state populations to support it so the government would change its intended vote. They were caught and backed off. Then they funded some NGO to do it :D


They just to "fine tune it" for the EU 24 official languages :)


It's already multilingual in most of those languages, if not all.


I appreciate that "tools" that are used to build the final version of a module/cli/service are explicitly managed through go.mod.

I really dislike that now I'm going to have two problems, managing other tools installed through a makefile, e.g. lint, and managing tools "installed" through go.mod, e.g. mocks generators, stringify, etc.

I feel like this is not a net negative on the ecosystem again. Each release Golang team adds thing to manage and makes it harder to interact with other codebases. In this case, each company will have to decide if they want to use "go tool" and when to use it. Each time I clone an open source repo I'm going to have to check how they manage their tools.


My personal estimation is that this will be noticeable in the first six months of 2025 in the USA big tech organizations.

I think this is actually already in motion in board meetings, I'm pretty sure executives are discussing something like "if we spend Z$ on AI tools, can we avoid hiring how many engineers?"


Okay, I'll come back in 6 months and we can assess this honestly.

The government projects this job type will grow 18% in the next decade: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/...


Many commenters suffer the first experience bias, they tried ChatGPT and it was "meh" so they see no impact.

I have tried cursor.ai, agent mode, and I see a clear big impact.


Yes. Some data-source that already takes that into account, that issue has been already solved.

Most uncertainty in temperature does not come from measured temperature (weather stations) but from temperature estimations from indirect sources. In other words, last 50 years data is pretty much all good.


I was intrigued by the value so did some research.

I would guess the 15$/hour value was chosen to approximate an average gross salary. The annualized payment would be 31200$[1] and it seems the average annual salary was around 30359$.

Updated to 2022 values the annual gross pay would be 10033€ [3], current average annual gross salary is 20483€ [4].

[1] 15$ * 2080 hours [2] https://www.repository.utl.pt/bitstream/10400.5/9819/1/ee-ja... [3] https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ipc&xlang=en [4] https://www.pordata.pt/pt/estatisticas/salarios-e-pensoes/sa...


Zero upside, probably a downside.

Apple has a top notch logistics and security processes which had mitigated the issue of supply chain attack in China which his willing and capable of producing such attacks.

Moving some production to the USA might induce some sloppiness in this due a perceived inferior risk.

Also, some security measures requested by Apple to manufacturers in other countries are probably illegal in the USA.


Also, some security measures requested by Apple to manufacturers in other countries are probably illegal in the USA.

That's interesting...do you have any specifics?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: