Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tills13's commentslogin

Oh it's not even rechargeable???? That vastly changes my opinion of this.

Person whose job it is to sell AI selling AI is what I got from this post.

in Italy we have a saying for this - "innkeeper, how is the wine?"

person whose job is to not be replaced by AI saying AI is hype is what I get from your comment

I does not work buddy. Nobody gets paid to not buy AI.

"it's difficult to make someone understand a thing when his job depends on him not understanding it"

surely there's an upper limit to this though with models literally eating themselves.

Not always, you can improve the loop by putting something real inside, like, a code execution tool, a search engine, a human, other AIs or an API. As long as the model can make use of that external environment its data can improve. By the same logic a human isolated from other humans for a long time might also be in a situation of going crazy.

Practical example - using LLMs to create deep research reports. It pulls over 500 sources into a complex analysis, and after all that compiling and contrasting it generates an article with references, like a wiki page. That text is probably superior to most of its sources in quality. It does not trust any one source completely, it does not even pretend to present the truth, it only summarizes the distribution of information it found on the topic. Imagine scaling wikipedia 1000x by deep-reporting every conceivable topic.


They already purposely train them on their own output, it's called synthetic training data.

When a human students learns to read more carefully we don't consider that a negative.

We can wait for that to start appearing in tests or benchmarks first.

isn't Plex literally an XBMC fork? And Jellyfin a Kodi fork? Something like that.

Yes, I think Plex was an XBMC fork and Kodi is the new name of XBMC. Jellyfin forked from Emby, I think when it became closed source. I never used Emby. Plex always seemed to cost money in confusing ways and that turned me off. My initial TV just used NFS shares on a unix machine and a Netgear NeoTV box (~2009) but eventually the codec support was too poor so I moved to XBMC on the Shield and then a number of years later to Jellyfin server on Linux with Jellyfin client on the Shield.

Plex used to routinely offer lifetime pass for like $80 at Black Friday until recently, so that was just an obvious decision if you even remotely used it. If you’re only planning on using it on your local network you don’t need to pay for anything.

Jellyfin is a fork of Emby. Can't speak for Plex.

yeah I'm back to Torrenting too. I was more than happy to pay for Prime, Netflix, and maybe Apple TV+ a few times a year but now they expect me to pay for HBO & Crave & x & y & z & a... I might as well get a cable package.

The funny thing is, between a NAS & a monthly VPN subscription & usenet subscriptions I probably could have paid for all those streaming services for a few years :D


you haven't priced out the streaming services (ad free tier) lately have you?

Having figured it out myself, I agree. And it's not obvious that you need both a Usenet _indexer_ (who tells you what content is available) and a Usenet provider (who actually serves you the content).

FWIW, and I'm not sure if this is against terms here, but I use newsgeek for the former and giganews for the latter. Both are paid services but reasonably priced imo. When I can find something on Usenet, it typically downloads with speeds > 10MBps vs. torrenting which can exceed that but is usually much slower.

You can use whatever client you want. I have the *arr stack mentioned elsewhere in this thread as well and SABnzbd is the recommended option there.


Are the downloads through http/tcp or some other protocol?

Between you and your provider the downloads are over HTTP. The distribution of content between the Usenet providers is over the Usenet protocol which predates HTTP and the WWW.

Sorry you feel that way.

Why is it that consumers always get shafted here and we just keep going on like "it's just business"

Why isn't some consumer protection regulator going "actually no, OpenAI, you can't corner the market for the foreseeable future"

Hell, make OpenAI pay for this shit up front. You want to corner the market? Put up the money you don't have.


Why does every blog nowadays read this way -- quick, witty, sentences "x wasn't the problem, it was the point" (or whatever) and have these section headers that are full thoughts? Or is this just more AI slop?

Is this sarcasm? While it may be true that my mother does not know what ffmpeg is I'm almost positive she interacts with stuff that uses it literally every single day.


...every media post on IG/FB/X/YT/news sites/AI.


So does a Siemens transformer, but it's era defining.

Why there's such a weird toxic empathy around ffmpeg?


Why do you shit on it? This software is literally holding the near entirety of video transcoding *worldwide* on its shoulders.


Good on them, can they and their groupies a bit more chill when facing valid criticism.

If this wasn't google but lone developer by now he'd be doxxed, fired and receiving death threats. It's not first time ffmpeg strikes like this.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: