Can't you see the billionaires sprouting in the Spring? Didn't you know they spread their delicate flowers just like Jasmine has for millions of years?
Meaningless. You are implying that unless someone is elected with 100% of votes, they do not represent the People?
> policies being put in place were not what was promised.
Again meaningless. Did Trump make promises specifically to not increase stringency of immigration law? He was elected to make decisions on behalf of the electorate.
> Which Americans do you mean specifically? And which abuse? That's not specific enough.
The Americans who elected the current President. Abuse by by companies and individuals defrauding American workers and taxpayers, while the government does nothing to combat it. The abuse by the government allowing millions of immigrants per year to the detriment of Americans (speaking of "not what was promised", the 1965 INA).
My point is that the majority of the country is against what Trump and his racist collaborators are doing. Personally, I think racism is bad.
> Abuse by by companies and individuals defrauding American workers and taxpayers, while the government does nothing to combat it
I don't think this is quite correct, but I do agree companies should not by able to abuse immigration law to abuse immigrants for cheap and/or pliant labor. Workers rights should be upheld universally and our country should invest in narrowing our insane wealth gap.
You comment sounds like snark but I understand if you don't know what Obamacare is.
(And I'm not an expert so hopefully people will correct any mistakes)
"Obamacare" was never healthcare for all. It is a GOP healthcare plan that heavily subsidizes private insurance. (Because free markets) And the current affordability crisis is the result of letting the government subsidies that help people pay for their Obamacare coverage lapse.
On a positive note: Obamacare (aka the ACA-PPP) did put some restrictions reasonable restrictions on the terrible things insurance companies used to do. For example, drop customers for "pre-existing conditions", impose lifetime payout maximums, etc.
Qft. Many of the provisions in ACA are direct GOP asks from the bipartisan negotiations around it... before the party decided to unanimously vote against it at the 11th hour.
The Telegraph is okay, but I find GB News publishes the stories that mainstream media chooses to avoid and/or minimise.
Without GB News' coverage of the migrant crisis, the UK public would be barely aware that 110,000 undocumented young men had entered the country in the last three years, many of whom have been housed in hotels at the taxpayer's expense.
And I don't think the Tavistock Center would have been forced to close in disgrace, had it not been for GB News reporting of the dubious and untested medical interventions being made on children there.
reply