What even nonsense is this? Other than I think therefore I type.
Please can you actually explain how this is just big business vs big business? When this solidifies practices that allow major parties to unfairly dominate?
Do you even understand what net neutrality rules are/do?
I think their point is that the effects of removing net neutrality mirror the effects already seen on large platforms, which is how most people use the web. Twitter, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, etc already have very opinionated views on what content can be on their platforms, and which content gets shown to users vs which gets lost in the mist of cyberspace (or is shadow banned). So the competition we're seeing here, between providers and tech platforms, is a competition over who gets to have this form of control over the media.
They make the companies you want to work for slightly less profitable. I guess that counts as immoral. I'm just sick of this grass roots lobbying that we're all supposed to take seriously as a fight for freedom.
Look at the comments here that are all the middle fucking management and senior leadership bozos with centrism fueling their holier than thou speed run of boot licking.
If you don't think limiting how ISPs can operate in terms of rates and carrying traffic is covered by "blanket bans on modes of operation", I don't know what to tell you.
Verizon literally referred to it as
> "arbitrary and capricious" intrusion which violates the company's right to free speech, stripping it of control over what its networks transmit and how.
Which is dramatic, but I'd say not much more melodramatic than the "Cable Package For Websites" rhetoric that was getting pushed.
-
But you're also clearly dealing with some personal issues that make you need people who don't agree with you to actually just be dumber than you? Wouldn't want to ruin the only thing you're clutching onto at this point...
(I should mention though, I'm from a country without net neutrality. It mostly looks like cheaper access to specific services for end users. You could argue that's a tad anti-competitive but that's a) not much different than bundling that already happens in the US b) not exactly the kind of fire and brimstone being promised...)
Please what cities? You are just making up rape stats. That’s makes you the bigger idiot here.
Ohh yeah so much corruption I don’t literally enjoy Zagreb more than any US city I have been to and it’s not even special. Because if this is just have the shittiest argument ever there’s my anecdotal rebuttal.
Wait you call making a bad bet not caring about money?
I’m so confused, your reasoning is just dumb.
Please explain how putting money into R/D has anything to do with gouging customers?
Is it because companies that tend to be more purely oriented on extracting profits often don’t put money into product R/D? So then therefore companies that do are not price gouging customers?
So how much money a company spends on researching a product suddenly makes that product have any real value? And if that value turns out less than profitable you think the business is basically a charity?
Like yes I’ll gladly go back to Reddit to be rid of this faux expert bullshit y’all got going on.
Only worth 2 billion?
I find it amazing how so many adults are still just children with more numbers.
