I will say I didn't disagree with DHH's use of "open source" as I will generally let it slide as its not "Open Source", the version that I attribute to following the Open Source Definition as set out by the Open Source Initiative
I agree that there are many who don't understand the distinction and assume that "Open Source" == "open source", and so I do agree that avoiding the use of "open source" where it instead means "non-OSD" makes sense
I do keep an eye on my (fairly privacy positive) analytics via Matomo and I've seen increase in readership over the years as well as spikes in traffic as ie I'm top on reddit, Hacker News or Lobsters
False equivalence - a random person can't go to a museum and then immediately go and paint exactly like another artist, but that's what the current LLM offerings allow
See Studio Ghibli's art style being ripped off, Disney suing Midjourney, etc
That's not exactly how LLMs learn either, they require huge amounts of training data to be able to imitate a style. And lots of human artists are able to imitate the style of one another as well, so I'm not sure what makes LLMs so different.
Regardless of whether you think IP laws should prevent LLMs from training on works under copyright, I hardly think the situation is beyond dispute. Whether copyright itself should even exist is something many dispute.
Why? Everyone won't use cooldowns, but the key is to have just enough people running brand new to set off a warning/have systems that check dependencies scan and find vulns go off and the packages get pulled before production builds them.
Monocultures where everyone pulls and builds with every brand new thing for the most minor changes is dangerous.
I don't feel like I've had any negative impact from that, or I'm very privileged to be able to say I don't care if I have had any impact from that - I've done fairly well for myself, and I can remind people I'm a full human being!
I agree that there are many who don't understand the distinction and assume that "Open Source" == "open source", and so I do agree that avoiding the use of "open source" where it instead means "non-OSD" makes sense
reply