Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dzdt's commentslogin

What percent of the kind of development that standardized tests measure do you think occurs within the context of the school building?

In New York the biggest driver behind technology is the state testing regime. Make the case to your administration that the chromebooks are insufficient for the state testing program and they will come up with the funds for upgrades.

I had aasumed the plan was killed for cynical political motivations, the same as apparantly caused the hangup and Hochul's near killing of NYC congestion pricing. Its really hard to gather evidence about what is the motivation for things though...

> Its really hard to gather evidence about what is the motivation for things though...

It can be, but it can also be hard to know where you should look.

https://tylervigen.com/the-mystery-of-the-bloomfield-bridge


This continues the trend that the C++ language spec is too large for any person to understand, full of opaquely named things for obscure use cases. Maybe when most code is written by LLMs this kind of extension will be appreciated? Because the LLM can manage to get its large head around all of these obscure functionalities and apply them in the appropriate situations?

Since the birth of ChatGPT, people have been talking about if one day LLMs will be trained to write bytecode or even machine code directly, making future code incomprehensible for humans.

It'd be funny if it ends up being just C++35.


this is silly, we already have an algorithm for generating very efficient assembly/machine code from source code, this is like saying maybe one day llms will be able to replace sin() or an os kernel (vaguely remember someone prominent claiming this absurdity), like yes, maybe it could, but it will be super slow and inefficient, we already know a very (most?) efficient algorithm, what are we doing?

I would love to see the first LLM shot in the foot with C++. I mean it is not like human devs don't do that right?

Maybe that's why AI images have all those extra fingers and toes!

I mean, you can see llms shooting themselves in the foot with c++ right now, just ask them to write it.

Crowdstrike level shot in the foot.

It is hardly any different from,

C Source code => Tradicional UNIX C compiler => ASM => object file

Now everyone is doing

AI tooling => C Source code => Tradicional UNIX C compiler => ASM => object file

For all pratical purposes, just like using a language like Nim, the workflow exposed to user can hide the middle steps.

Then there is the other take, if you start using agents that can be configured to do tool calling, it is hardly any different from low code applications, doing REST/GraphQL/gRPC calls orchestrated via flow charts, which is exactly what iPaSS tooling are offering nowadays, like Workato, Boomi,...


> Now everyone is doing > > AI tooling => C Source code => Tradicional UNIX C compiler => ASM => object file

Certainly not. I'm using AI to write Rust, the compiler is way better at telling the AI it goofed completely, and the resulting code (once the AI managed to get rid of errors/warnings) has a much better chance of actually working well.


The use of C was only an example, and I can bet that AI can also goof Rust code that goes through the compiler if that is your argument.

Unless you now tell me that you drive your AI generation code with full coverage unit tests manually written by you.


Or, like the Shakespeare programming language.

https://shakespearelang.com/


you don't have to use it

but you will have to read it if someone else uses it.

This would be a natural role for the Post Office to take on, to provide a neutral ad-free, privacy-respecting messaging platform accessible to all.

I think the natural and equivalent role of the USPS would be an ISP, rather than a "messaging platform" itself.

When the US Constitution was drafted in 1787, authorizing the new Federal government to run a postal service, carrying letters and packages via horse rider/wagons was the state-of-the-art.


I hadn't really thought about that. Interesting.

Early in the 2000's one of the original authors of Sfarflight posted a massive dump of information online: design documents and source code. That is the "Technical Articles Saved from Oblivion" link in this repository. Sadly no one seems to have managed to save a full copy! This is one I kick myself about: I browsed this back when it was up but didnt think to download. These days I make a point to request Internet Archives to save things like this if I ever come across it.

About halfway through my reverse-engineering process, I came across those documents and realized that roughly 50% were missing. I searched pretty much the entire web to see if anyone had stored these files elsewhere, but so far I haven’t had any luck.

I'm not sure what you're referring to since the files T.C. Lee posted on that geocities site are the only design documents he (or anyone else) ever released, and those are preserved in the SFFiles.zip found at the oocities mirror linked from the github there. That zip contained only a partial dump of some source code, while that sonic.net page contains a more complete copy (but lacks any kind of design documents whatsoever). Was there something else you were referring to?

I seem to recall browsing what appeared to be the complete source back in the day. I put in a bit of an effort to get it compiling, but it was only released as poorly scanned printouts of the source code and OCR wasn't so good then so the project was bigger than I hoped.

That would be the source code posted to that sonic.net site. It was a mix of raw dumps of FORTH blocks and printouts converted to PDFs. It wasn't the full source code, and there weren't any design documents in there.

You can see on archive.org where it captured directory info for files which were not stored:

https://web.archive.org/web/20031218202130/http://www.sonic....

When you navigate those directory archives many of the files are missing. E.g.

https://web.archive.org/web/20030529230704/http://www.sonic....

Some design documents ARE there, e.g. "Specification of 3d display for starquest" : https://web.archive.org/web/20030719111039if_/http://www.son...


Well....... shit. I'd been in there previously and never noticed that. Disregard.

Hard shades of Google dropping "don't be evil".

Replacing with:

Do the right thing

(for the shareholders)


Idk why people are so upset when they readily embrace capitalism.

It's like the stick in bicycle wheel meme.


And people who like getting raises dont like leaving things alone...

vibe-shoring


(2023)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: