Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | aslakhellesoy's commentslogin

Shhh don’t let them know!


FYI: DocuSign’s moat/USP is trust, not software.

DocuSign customers buy trust.


For a cheaper alternative from a trusted company, Google Docs has the feature.


Firefox has it built in now, too


Trust and Regulation like QTSP and all the other red tape


Really? Trust to send an email with a link? What else is making it trustworthy?


You’d be surprised how much trust people place in legal departments, balance sheet strength and talent capacity. All things for which I had to turn down superior technical proposals in the past. The old saying „Nobody gets fired for buying IBM“ still runs strong.

Free e-signatures are a great idea, have you considered getting a foundation to back the project and maybe taking out some indemnity insurance, perhaps raising a dispute fund?


That big companies use it for their important legal contracts.

its a well recognised tool for contract agreements, and you pay the money so that you are indemnified for any oopsies that might happen in transit.


Because when you send a document for a $75MM contract to be signed you want to send it via a well known and trusted document signing platform like Docusign where you know everything is legit and legally defensible.


I wonder how this compares to csvkit [1].

[1]: https://csvkit.readthedocs.io/


I’ve been using Mermerd [1] for years and never looked back. Simple, does one thing well.

It gets even better with elk layout - just prepend this frontmatter snippet to mermerd’s output:

    ---
    config:
      layout: elk
    ---

[1]: https://github.com/KarnerTh/mermerd


This sounds very similar to AWS CDK. How does it compare?


Basically before CDK, this type of offering made sense but the truth is that AWS correctly identified this need to quickly scaffold infrastructures AND edit it without requiring YAML, Cloudformation or other declarative syntax like Terraform.

CDK is literally writing Python code. You can organize your files and write out logic in all the ways you could possibly. CDK offers tremendous value in this regard but the downside being you won't be able to generate the same layout on Azure or Google but that's a given.

On one end of the spectrum you could have a hybrid of Azure/Google cloud products but with AWS as your main base, vice versa. However, usually in my personal experience, you rarely end up deploying a complete stack on both clouds. It's like take that product from Google or Azure and make it work with AWS, in such scenario you could simply do most of the stuff in CDK and then wire up separate products (but to each their own).

The only use case where I think might require Terraform to a large degree is if you make heavy use of VPC'd, full stack across multiple clouds (ex. agency or consulting firm) but for majority of cases I don't really leave AWS and neither is there an expectation to from clients and employers (they rather just stick to AWS for everything if possible)

tldr: Terraform and tools like what OP is offering, were used to scaffold infra on AWS but CDK came along and really made it unecessary—just learn Python or a backend developer to scaffold infra on AWS in Python.


Stacktape is a whole "cloud development framework". It's not only about infrastructure management, but also about all the other DevOps-related tasks you come across when developing/running an application on AWS.

- In my opinion, it's even easier to use than a CDK L3 construct.

- It supports local/remote development, source-code packaging, deployment artifact management, secret management, domain management and much more.

- Besides AWS resources, it supports other 3rd party services (like MongoDB Atlas clusters and Upstash Kafka/Redis).

- It has a local development studio - GUI (currently in private beta).


By the way, Hashicorp is working on a version of the CDK that outputs Terraform.

https://www.terraform.io/cdktf


holy cow!!! thanks for this now i can point clients to this when they insist on Terraform.


I believe AWS CDK is actually written in JS, natively, and ported to other languages, inc. Python, using sort of a transpiler they created for that purpose.


True!


Why is Python better than Terraform language for this use case?


I guess because the language is more expressive.


That’s not necessarily a good thing for configuration


I guess this will support other cloud providers in the future?


Excellent work!

Postgraphile uses a naming convention for postgres functions to extend the GraphQL schema [1].

Do you have any plans to support a similar mechanism in pg_graphql?

[1]: https://www.graphile.org/postgraphile/functions/


Thanks!

Yes, we currently support extending table types via functions using a naming convention. The docs for that feature are available here https://supabase.github.io/pg_graphql/computed_fields/#exten...

It's also on the near-term roadmap to implement custom mutations from user defined functions, similar to postgraphile


Excellent - thanks!


Congratulations on the launch - this sounds interesting.

I'm currently using Postgraphile[0], which uses Postgres' introspection API to discover the schema structure.

Would this still work with Hydra?

[0] https://www.graphile.org/postgraphile/


Absolutely! Hydra is 100% Postgres and supports any existing Postgres-compatible tools.


This is exactly why I love Example Mapping.

https://cucumber.io/blog/bdd/example-mapping-introduction/


From the site:

> By continuing to browse, you consent to our use of cookies

That's not how the GDPR works. [0] Here's an alternative summary. [1]

[0] https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-pecr/cookies-a...

[1] https://automationpanda.com/2018/02/27/bdd-example-mapping/


Looks very interesting! Any plans to support DynamoDB/Scylla?


I would love to support Scylla, I ** love that database, those guys are magicians. And I assume in supporting that we'd also offer de-facto support for Cassandra.

I don't think either Scylla or dynamo are on the roadmap now, but if you want them feel free to create an issue asking for them: https://github.com/mindsdb/mindsdb

It should be noted that there's two level of support:

1. As a source of data (easy to implement) 2. Being able to publish models into the database (a bit harder)

If you work with those and are interested in doing ML from the database please get in touch, ideally via github, but you can also use the contact form (https://mindsdb.com/contact-us/) or email one of us directly. The best case scenario for us is that when we do one of these integrations we have an actual user in mind, and we're open to "first users" for any database where we can find a reasonable way of integrating.


Thanks for asking! We develop based on community requests, if you want we can setup a call, and we can see if we can help you with your data on DynamoDB/SCylia, its becoming pretty fast now to support new databases. send us an email to adam jorge at mindsdb.com


If you do have a Scylla use case, please also feel free to let us Scylla monsters know: peter at scylladb dot com. Very encouraged to see such a great convergence occurring between NoSQL + ML. The camps between data scientists and data engineers have been pitched too far apart to date. My best wishes to all those who helped bring this to fruition.


I created a tool (bumbailiff) that allows a team to accrue a limited amount of debt, for a limited period of time. Then it fails the build.

Read more about it here: https://cucumber.io/blog/bdd/todo-or-not-todo/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: