That's is funniest thing I read since long time :)) I mean: it's so absurd, almost like things we had in real socialism in 80s :> But, yeah, freedom have consequences.
They are not socialists by any mean. EU is on every front very neoliberal (way too much for my French taste), and it has been like that since its inception without real interruption.
Pleas think before forking(). Do not follow Apache blindly...
Code, as is today, looks [acording to benchmarks] better then nginx, except one case !
There is fcgi in, right ? So all that additional processes are already started in the backend. If benchmarks are real no need to complicate code before some industry adoption. Of course there can be a branch to check possibilities :)
And forking is complicated and full of surprising traps. Even if they are somewhat "standard" historic Unix traps... Case study: Perl - better don't use fork there even if "threads" are in.
First: what ? What that "digital" is ? Is it important anyway ? Buttons clicking ? Learn kids to watch videos in some frames or full screen ?? That is just medium. So what need to be learned ? What is important to make it into kids brains ?
Domain knowledge is important. And domain knowledge is route to specialization. So there is many ways to learn, one or more per university "discipline"...
And all that requires time to memorize and practice to learning be persistent in the brain.
So we need humans-experts to verify AI stupid mishmash.
So students need to practice and memorize domain things so their internal neuron nets and etc be trained to know specialized domain stuff.
So make them use blackboard and paper and pencils as thinking tools while they use "digital" interfaces.
If someone want to prohibit real paper and pencils then ditch their "digital workflows" and ask who paid them to promote that software/hardware stack.
"knowledge to the brains" first, not time wasting on some screen watching because someone wants something something "digital".
And open source/open access is just form of medium. Of secondary importance.
Teacher need to prepare syllabus/conspectus (and know things there) or maybe whole subject (many lessons) and drop it on students. As always.
Problem is more on students side: learning need to be pushed to the brains anyways. It is just like gym.
Maybe main problem is this: students need to be interested or see reason for learning that knowledge pieces and pieces hidden behind that pieces...
Over the years there already was almost the identical articles about making in language X program as fast as C or C++... And results was exactly the same: write C/C++ style programs!
Why ?
Because of CPU's architecture - given CPU one just need to structure code in a way CPU can perform efficiently! Is it such surprising that all sugar and multi-functional smartness have cost of all that if's and loops like maps? CPU is just rock stupid and can't do anything else!
That's from where all that specialized instructions are coming and programs just need to be structured or compiled to CPU arch way to perform as fast as CPU and rest of hardware allows...
And there are some "Java machines" and that is exaclty the same story: use CPU native lang :) As much as posible.
That's is funniest thing I read since long time :)) I mean: it's so absurd, almost like things we had in real socialism in 80s :> But, yeah, freedom have consequences.