Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Jnr's commentslogin

Real developers use whatever the fuck they want as long as it gets the job done.

Note the “/s”.

That only works on reddit, this is aiming to be a place for insightful comments and fruitful discussion

My guess would be that Synology is an expensive but weak computer, bare minimum for NAS.

Immich does require some CPU and also GPU for video transcoding and vector search embedding generation.

I had Immich (and many other containers) running successfully on AMD Ryzen 2400G for years. And recently I upgraded to 5700G since it was a cheap upgrade.


OpenVPN is far from "no fuss", especially when compared to Tailscale.

I like to self host things so I also self host Headscale (private tailnet) and private derp proxy nodes (it is like TURN). Since derp uses https and can run on 443 using SNI I get access to my network also at hotels and other shady places where most of the UDP and TCP traffic is blocked.

Tailscale ACL is also great and requires more work to achieve the same result using OpenVPN.

And Tailscale creates a wireguard mesh which is great since not everything goes through the central server.

You should give it a try.


Why not just use wireguard directly? The configuration is fairly trivial

Wireguard is great, I have personally donated to it and have used Wireguard for years before it became stable. And I still use it on devices (routers) where Tailscale is not supported. But as Jason stated - it is quite basic and is supposed to be used in other tools and this is what we are seeing with solutions like Tailscale.

Tailscale makes it simple for the user - no need to set up and maintain complex configurations, just install it, sign in with your SSO and it does everything for you. Amazing!


With Tailscale you don't have to learn anything, you just install apps and click.

One value of Tailscale for a ton of simple use-cases is that people don't have time / don't want to learn.


Even more trivial with Tailscale, so why wouldn’t I use Tailscale to configure wireguard for me?

I'm a bit skeptical that I don't have full control of my keys, but it does seem convenient.

You can have full control over your keys if you want: https://tailscale.com/kb/1226/tailnet-lock

I create local and remote restic backups (using Backrest). I just point to the docker mount points and run database export as a pre-hook.

The offline sync was a bit problematic in the past but this year they finally got it working properly.

Can confirm, they put in a ton of effort to fix it and they delivered. Flawless on ios since many versions ago.


That device is bafflingly LTE cat20 with 2Gbps downlink, and then has LAN connectivity only through a single 1Gbps ethernet port.

Actually, it seems one of the advantages of the new Ubiquiti devices over Teltonika/Mikrotik/Gl.iNet is that they actually have 10 Gbps SFP+ and 2.5 Gbps ethernet ports.


Maybe they were thinking realistically that we will never get those 2Gbps from cell towers. :)

I patched and rebuilt what I could and added custom Crowdsec WAF rules for this, in case I missed something.

XMPP felt great when compared to Matrix. Matrix was in a bad state some years ago when I hosted it for a while, and seems like it still is the same messy state. I avoid it as much as possible but for some reason there are communities using it.

At this point it should just die so people would be motivated to replace it with something better.


> I avoid it as much as possible but for some reason there are communities using it.

The "for some reason", at least for my group, is because it's rock solid for us. We have no reason to want to change, so of course we are using it.


People are motivated to replace it with something better, it's called Matrix 2.0.

Which perfectly fits the Matrix ethos of everything constantly being rewritten or replaced with something new that only implements half the features before the original thing is ever finished.

https://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html

Copy-paste the link, otherwise the Easter egg might be offensive to some :-D


I like this more than sticking to things you know you won't be happy with.

Do they plan to fix the fundamental issues of Matrix in 2.0 or should I wait for 3.0?

you could be less vague

I could, that's why the link has a few more words about the issues with matrix.

Great, even less vague nw - will get you an answer, not.

I tried it a year ago when it was introduced, it did not work. Is it stable now?

Matrix 2.0?

Not quite yet, but it was promised that the next release will be Matrix 2.0


I guess it was the Element X client that was advertised as Matrix 2.0 client and that did not work.

It does (now), been using it daily for months now

That sounds awesome!

It is a fork of Fedora, one of the most stable distros out there. It is more geared towards regular users when compared to Arch on which SteamOS is based.

I am a long time Arch user but I totally understand why they went with Fedora for Bazzite.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: