This question is usually asked in bad faith, but I'll bite.
Gender ideologues or genderists believe that whether someone is a man or a woman is determined primarily by that person's gender self-identification ("A woman is anyone who identifies as a woman").
This in contrast with the classic belief, held by radical feminists, J. K. Rowling, and many others, that whether someone is a man or a woman is determined primarily by the physical attributes of their bodies related to biological sex (genetics, hormones, gonads, etc.)
As well as making the claim that woman and men are merely identities, most genderists also rely on sexist stereotyping to support this belief.
Such as, displaying a photograph of a man wearing makeup, styling his hair long and wearing attire more typically worn by female people, and asking incredulously, "so are you saying she isn't a woman?!"
Or citing childhood memories recalled by men who call themselves women, of "playing with Barbies" and suchlike, supposedly on the basis that boys don't do that so they must be girls.
Genderism isn't just a ludicrous, reality-denying ideology, it's fundamentally sexist too.
Why should I answer, you made up your judgement from my initial comment and there was no substance in the reply. My mistake was to reply in the first place. For the record, I understood the colloquialism even if English isn't my native tongue.
So CSAM is fine, as long as those who don't like it choose not to use the platform.
Sorry, then you're a pedo-excusing ejut.
It's not about judgement, or mistakenly replying, it's about what you've written. If you didn't mean that, then own it and clarify. Because that's what you said.
It was shown that rightoid subs have way more censorship and controlled by way fewer people. Reality has a liberal bias, so of course an average subreddit will appear to be "leftist". Of course "leftist" to a rightoid means just not a far-right sub.
> You may not hide behind "It's just a different opinion" when you want to be evil. If you for example want to tell a lie and say that Renee Good was not innocent, then we will permanently ban you. Or if you want to show everyone you're evil and you support Trump's secret police which exists to kidnap innocents and terrorize citizens, then we will permanently ban you.
This is /r/comics, of all places, but this is the norm across Reddit.
Nothing you read on that site is in any way representative of actual public opinion. It is a carefully curated cesspit of manufactured consensus.
This is not true. You have to procure it and take it consistently over a long period of time, there are side effects, and some people really dislike needles.
Yes, don't focus on critically thinking WHAT is being said in a comment, focus on how old the account is. That's the objective way to judge an opinion. Jesus, no wonder politics is cooked and getting people killed.
Have you thought about the fact that the reason you don't see old accounts with conservative opinions on HN is because they get banned/flagged/downvoted into oblivion due to abuse by political bias like yours trying to push and mention their ideology while suppressing the other?
But that would require you to have critical thinking skills.
I've looked at his other repos and it's the same shit. Responses are also quite funny, does he not realize this reads like the worst of AI?
reply