It's good to agree that some don't have a conscience, and maintaining an appearance matters more. And appearances change based on what's legal or not.
They could detect the other AI labs and also silently burn the tokens at a faster rate providing fewer tokens for money, which does sound illegal to me.
The comments only further prove that without more regulation around this, big AI wouldn't have a "don't be evil" attitude going forward.
It's like looking at the EU now and wondering, how did they not see this glaring dependency before now? Both the petro energy source and the US military support were never as secure as it seems they were assumed to be.
Here in the US, we're still sitting on a constitution from 250 years ago. Apparently no one though an incoming presidential administration would rape and pillage the place like we've seen in the last year and a half.
European countries did largely overhaul their constitutional documents after WWII. The EU in general has much more modern legislative bodies, and electoral systems.
Here in the US, we're still stuck with founding documents that expect Pony Express to deliver the ballots 8-/
I used Fable 5 for maybe 10 hours in the window when it was available. It was much better than Opus 4.8. And I have found the Opus models to be excellent, but Fable 5 was cranking out incredible research on some data sources I wanted to plumb into my project.
I wouldn't personally pay API pricing for it for my personal projects, but I bet it's going to be absolutely slammed with usage for the next month+.
Imagine a country extending citizenship to a whole group of people for no reason other than the location of their birth, and then allowing said people to access the benefits of citizenship, including the ability to receive welfare benefits, vote, and run for office.
>> The dems need to run on fixing the economy and not retribution. They can go after him once they're in power, but don't run on it.
This isn’t going to work. Not this time. Because it’s basically classic Democratic centrism and Dem voters are fed up with it. We are already seeing evidence of this in all the special elections and primaries. By the time this November’s election is over, it will be undeniable.
Old fashioned guy here. I use ethernet over wires. It's frickin foolproof.
and I have a USB-C ethernet adapter for "portable" devices, probably a Lightning to ethernet adapter somewhere in the cable box. I got it at a thrift store. It really helped some zoom calls.
Did Siri have any advice? Buy a new mac?
I grabbed an imac at $150 off the previous market price, which jumped $200 overnight, saving $350.
Worst Buy raised the price "$1150, sale ends Sunday" Friday night or Saturday, but Costco held their sale price. Ethernet adapter at the ready!
I can’t turn 10x work into 20x work because I have to ensure the two juniors in my team who are now creating 50x work won’t merge complete garbage, reviewed by another engineer that has already given up on caring.
I can’t turn 10x work into 20x work because my Product Manager thinks changing fundamental premises of tasks I already spent two weeks on (mostly removing human blockers) is very simple. After all, when he asked Claude to update his prototype, it only took it 10 minutes.
I can’t turn 10x work into 20x work because the company dedicated entire teams to write company-wide skills for everything. They suck, but if I don’t use them, I’m not following the new “golden path for engineering”, and I lose points in my performance review.
I can, however, turn 10x work into 20x work, or even much more than that, if AI actually did what it’s promising and eliminated most of my team, the product manager, and the middle managers. Or me. I could use a break.
Read the guidelines, you can make your point without calling people "suckers".
> When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."
...or the evacuation of highly populated Long Island.
Three Mile Island was a * big * deal - if that had happened on Long Island, it would've been unimaginable disaster and permanent stain on NYC.
To many people, "three strikes you're out" - 3MI, Chernobyl and Fukushima was the final straw, reasoning that even the Japanese can't safely manage this technology, so "Homer Simpson" stands no chance.
Meanwhile, even the country's leading experts have no politically viable strategy for disposing of the waste, including the risk of derailments, terrorism, etc.
This isn't the world I want, but it's reality. IRL, people would rather die slowly from CO2 than live with the fear of 3MI/Chernobyl/Fukushima regardless of how rare they are (and they're not).
I'm optimistic that modern reactor designs and reprocessing technologies can overcome these issues, but I can understand why voters go full NIMBY.
Yes and no. The tariffs decision was fractured. There were really two prats. The first was that a statutory interpretation of IEEPA didn't give the President the power to tax. That authority lies with Congress. The MQD, to me at least, felt shoe-horned in tehre, kind of to justify its existence. But a statutory interpretation was sufficient to rebuke the President's authority so why the rest? It feels like the court is saying "see? we use this on Trump too. We're not biased".
You're on Hacker News. This is a site full of developers who are convinced that "proper software engineering" is 100% of what makes a business successful, and everything and everyone else is useless. You can't just waltz in here and point out that code in business is a means to an end and expect not to get downvoted.
We need to to task X today, we're going to do Task Y later. But we need both task X and task Y to complete the whole project. But the solution for task X is wrong because it conflicts with task Y. And when we get to task Y, we won't be able to deliver. And Chet know this. But the author don't want to listen to Chet, and the author is wrong for that.
While the situation is:
The project is already defined. There's task X to be done, and we have settle on a solution A for it. Chet is the one who will be implementing it. Chet uncovers a situation that leads him to believe that the solution B is better because of a constraint that will come in effect in 3 weeks. He says that he can implement A, but because we're going to need B in 3 weeks, let's scrap A and go with B instead. Now the author knows both A and B (and maybe B was discussed beforehand but Chet don't knows about it),and says that B don't matter, A is good enough.
Instead of asking why, Chet decide to argue for the validity of B. The author reiterates that B doesn't matter. At the end Chet decides to walk away. And never wanted to learn why A is the better choice when B seems to be perfect.
I was Chet at one time and never have someone like the author to rein me in. I get cured from wanting to implement complicated solution when client asked me for demos and I couldn't show anything because I was trying to solve everything. And you're right, they don't care about code. They care about working product, and today, not in 3 weeks. So between A and B, I deliver A first, then worry about B.
And when someone higher than you (and better placed to have more information about the constraint of the project) refuses your idea. You ask why, you don't immediately try to prove your position. Imagine doing that in the army.
If you're an enterprise (including startups), you worry about customers, not code quality. There are famously many startups that gained traction despite shit code and then eventually got around to fixing it, to whatever extent was possible, like Facebook HHVM, Stripe's Sorbet, etc.
I stopped using Reddit daily when they killed Apollo. Now it looks like I’ll stop using it entirely. Good riddance, thanks for killing my doomscrolling addiction for me.
Rough - this is an ugly article, because like Ayn Rand it has the illusion of truth.
A bit like saying "Democracy is the worst form of government, except all the others."
Meritocracy is doubtless a fallacy, as anyone who has attended any kind of elite institution understands. That Xi or Putin or Trump or Clinton's children should get in despite their lack of ability is an affront to the notion of meritocracy itself.
We should therefore not ascribe moral value to meritocracy - it is an illusion. However, it is a worthwhile ideal to attempt to live up to. We attempt to rise to the level of our expectations - failing every time.
Confucianism is preferable to the robber's logic because we can see what happens when the robbers rule. The world is even more arbitrary, capricious and unfair.
I predict we all be using the hell out of fable until the next great model comes around and in two weeks we won’t be talking about the export controls anymore. We just don’t have the attention span.
Nobody should be putting loadbearing weight on Amazon or Microsoft with their ruthless monopoly ambitions, yet here we are
They could detect the other AI labs and also silently burn the tokens at a faster rate providing fewer tokens for money, which does sound illegal to me.
The comments only further prove that without more regulation around this, big AI wouldn't have a "don't be evil" attitude going forward.