I think we agree - we have arbritrary goalposts regarding AGI and they have been met. WE don't know what we consider to be "the big changing moment" and that moment is hard to define because we don't have a good definition of it when we talk about ourselves even.
So the convo becomes - what is that "thing" and do we need to draw similarities between "it" and our own intelligence.
Why would it specifically be job-displacement-via-LLM's that signal AGI? Why not job-displacement-via-automated-robot? or job-displacement-via-office-technology?
That seems like a pretty dangerous place to set your goalposts. Don't you think we need to see what's coming and figure out how to deal with it before widespread job destruction starts?
So the convo becomes - what is that "thing" and do we need to draw similarities between "it" and our own intelligence.