Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Green account with a low-effort sarcastic comment. Worthy not only of downvotes, but public derision.

Do you have any desire, or idea, on how to curb cyber-agitprop from enemy nations? Is living in a world with rampant, effective, agitprop on the internet with zero reaction the least of all evils?



It's a fair question. No, no desire to curb anything because of who is going to do the curbing. Any regulating entity (government or private) will use subjective judgement and will invariably devolve into censorship. The concern of course is that humans as a crowd are dumb, but on the other hand I think you give individuals too little credit. A smart person won't get his/her political views from random X posts.

The problem is that most americans do not know first hand how the real censorship looks like. In the context of the previous discussion in that thread, chinese and russian firewalls block any discussion of gay rights issues. Do you think the US will be any different? We are all humans with the same deficiencies. Any "firewall", however it is implemented, will be a double edged sword that will eventually start cutting one way, and you won't like the result.

To sum it up, yes, it's the least of all evils.

If you would like to deride the answer, I assure you I am quite immune to the effort.


I agree with your concerns but I am not sure that it is all or nothing, in the way that encryption security is, for example.

I think that agitprop campaigns are identifiable by the organizations on which they operate, and that site operators should consider that akin to spam and delete it.

Of course I do not advocate an actual firewall. We saw Instagram and the US try to censor the carnage in Gaza, and "allies" like Israel have acknowledged their desire to control the information space to suit their narrative.

Thank you for a real response.


I think what you are saying is still on a shaky ground if I understood you correctly. Site operators will have a political bias that will skew the decisions. And of course there is pay to play and kickbacks... integrity was for sale ever since humans existed. Think in terms of what the internet gave us instead of what it has taken away. In my youth, I had to listen to shortwave to find the other side of the story.


>Do you have any desire, or idea, on how to curb cyber-agitprop from enemy nations

Ban anonymous comments.

>Is living in a world with rampant, effective, agitprop on the internet with zero reaction the least of all evils?

Given the impact on political discourse and outcomes, I would say most definitely not.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: