Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

not ad hominem - i know nothing about him as a person. i have read 3 or 4 of his books (have you?) and found them pretty worthless.


In your original post, you dismissed the article because you read previous books of his and thought they were bad. That is literally an ad hominem.


no, it isn't. ad hominem is attacking a person. i was criticising his writings.


You are attacking the person's writing capability, implying that the article is not good because they wrote something before that you disagreed with. You're trying to argue semantics here, but it doesn't really matter because either way your argument is fallacious.


Yes, "all a bit pants" really plumbs the depths of intellectual critique.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: